Dedicated team
Never a single operative. The relay of observers ensures continuity and reduces the risk of being spotted.
It is one of the oldest investigative techniques and, today, one of the most tightly regulated under Italian law. When applied correctly — in line with art. 134 TULPS, the GDPR and the case law of the Court of Cassation — it remains one of the most effective tools for documenting conduct of legal and corporate significance.
Legal surveillance is the technique of dynamic observation of a person during their movements in public, aimed at documenting behaviour, acquaintances, locations, and the consistency between what is declared and what is observed.
It is not «chasing someone». It is a structured activity, carried out by trained operatives licensed under art. 134 TULPS, with suitable equipment, defined timeframes and progressive documentation, that respects two essential constraints: lawfulness and the dignity of the person under observation.
Surveillance makes sense when the objective calls for observing concrete behaviour over time: movements, meetings, routines, and the consistency between what a person declares and what they actually do.
Documenting a habitual or ongoing extramarital relationship.
Verifying how a parent manages time with the children and their own acquaintances.
Establishing whether an employee uses leave or a period of sick leave in a way consistent with the purpose the law is meant to protect.
Documenting meetings with clients, suppliers or former colleagues involved in competing activity.
Proving the existence of a parallel work activity incompatible with the current employment relationship.
When the objective does not require observation over time, we propose other techniques (documentary analysis, open source, qualified interviews). Surveillance is a tool, not an automatic reflex.
Never a single operative. The relay of observers ensures continuity and reduces the risk of being spotted.
Cameras with suitable lenses, discreet video recording, precise geolocation of the material.
For extended observations we rotate personnel and vehicles, so that our presence does not become noticeable.
Each day closes with an internal written record, a timeline and indexing of the multimedia material.
Every session has a plan, and every session closes with an internal update to the team and, where agreed, to the client.
Regulatory framework
Evidence gathered through legal surveillance is admissible in proceedings when the activity is carried out in compliance with four cumulative conditions.
In employment matters the Court of Cassation has confirmed, in several rulings, the admissibility of the investigative report as an item of evidence that the judge may assess (among others, Cass. civ. sez. lav. n. 4984/2014, n. 9217/2016, n. 25674/2018, n. 16622/2020). These judgments point to the legitimacy of engaging investigative agencies licensed under art. 134 TULPS to verify infidelity, abuse of Legge 104, and instrumental sick leave, always provided that the observation takes place away from the workplace and with respect for personal dignity.
Our reports are built to hold up precisely in that setting, with a chain of custody for the evidence and a record of the operatives, vehicles and times involved.
Cumulative conditions for admissibility
Legal surveillance is not, and does not include:
Every engagement has a written, verifiable scope. We never step outside that scope. Surveillance self-organised by a private individual (not a licensed investigator), persistent and capable of generating a state of anxiety, may constitute the offence of stalking (art. 612-bis of the Italian Criminal Code).
Answers to the recurring questions about the admissibility, duration, legality and methods of investigative surveillance.
Let's assess together whether legal surveillance is the right technique for your objective. Operating base in Milan, engagements across Lombardy and all of Italy.